DSIP Peptide Dosage Calculator and Dosing Chart
Emideltide, a nine-amino-acid peptide studied decades ago by intravenous infusion. Small insomnia trials were inconsistent, and no human subcutaneous dose has been studied.
Written by Kashif Khan, who builds and maintains this site and is not a clinician. Every figure links to its primary source.
Not FDA-approved; FDA review weighed against 503A listing
The FDA evaluated emideltide — another name for DSIP — for compounded subcutaneous products proposed for chronic insomnia, narcolepsy and opioid withdrawal. Its May 2026 briefing concluded that the criteria weighed against placing emideltide free base or acetate on the 503A Bulks List. The FDA's current safety-risk page lists emideltide under nominations that were withdrawn and says it lacks sufficient information to know whether the proposed route would harm humans.
No approved human dose exists for this compound in any country. The figures below are the doses used in named published studies, reproduced for reference only. Doses given to rats or mice do not convert to a human dose. The FDA has stated that labelling a product “research use only” or “not for human consumption” does not change its legal status when the seller's own marketing shows it is intended for people.
Key facts
- Molecular weight
- 848.8 DaFree-base emideltide: Trp-Ala-Gly-Gly-Asp-Ala-Ser-Gly-Glu. The acetate salt adds a variable amount of acetate and should not be treated as the same molecular mass.
- Half-life
- Not published. No accessible human pharmacokinetic study reports one, so any specific figure quoted elsewhere has no primary source behind it.
- Also sold as
- delta sleep-inducing peptide, emideltide
Doses used in published studies
These are reproduced for reference. They are not recommendations, and an animal dose in mg/kg does not convert to a human dose.
How good is the evidence?
Old, small and route-specific. The FDA found human studies covering 209 subjects exposed to 25–150 nmol/kg intravenously for 1–15 days, but judged the effectiveness evidence insufficient and the insomnia findings inconclusive or preliminary. It found no clinical safety data for the proposed subcutaneous route. A 1992 double-blind study in 16 people with chronic insomnia found only weak changes and concluded that short-term DSIP was unlikely to provide major therapeutic benefit.
DSIP peptide dosing chart: what was actually studied
The repeatable figure in the human sleep literature is 25 nmol/kg by intravenous infusion, equivalent to about 21.2 µg/kg for the 848.8 Da free-base peptide. That number appears in small experiments with different timing and infusion durations. It is a historical study dose, not an approved dose and not a subcutaneous dosing protocol.
Across the larger safety record reviewed by the FDA, intravenous exposure ranged from 25 to 150 nmol/kg for 1 to 15 days. Pooling those experiments does not create a dosing range for insomnia: the studies differed in population, purpose and design, and the FDA concluded that evidence of effectiveness was insufficient.
Why the calculator does not recommend a DSIP injection schedule
Retail DSIP vials are generally discussed as subcutaneous injections, but the human literature the FDA identified used intravenous administration. FDA reviewers found no clinical studies containing safety information for the proposed subcutaneous route. Changing the route changes absorption, exposure and risk, so an IV study dose cannot simply be copied onto a subcutaneous syringe.
The calculator therefore does one limited job: it converts the mass stated on a vial and the liquid added into concentration, millilitres and U-100 syringe units. Its 100 mcg starting value is an editable arithmetic example. It is not a dose recommendation, and the historical study table is kept separate so the two are not mistaken for each other.
What the FDA found about DSIP safety and effectiveness
For chronic insomnia, the FDA described the evidence as inconclusive and at best preliminary, citing small samples, inconsistent results, varying regimens and weak study methods. In the 16-person double-blind study, the statistically significant changes were weak, subjective sleep quality did not improve, and the authors themselves said major therapeutic benefit was unlikely.
The FDA also flagged potential immunogenicity from peptide aggregation and impurities in an injected product. Intravenous insomnia studies reported no significant adverse effects, but withdrawal studies recorded transient headache, nausea and vertigo, plus cases of hypotension. None of that resolves the safety of a subcutaneous product made and used differently.
Common questions
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of the documents below. Where no reliable source exists, the page says so instead of filling the gap.
- RegulatorFDA Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee· 2026-05-11FDA evaluation of emideltide (DSIP)-related bulk drug substances for the 503A Bulks List
- RegulatorFDACertain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding May Present Significant Safety Risks
- Published studyNeuropsychobiology· 1992Bes F et al. Effects of delta sleep-inducing peptide on sleep of chronic insomniac patients — a double-blind study
- Published studyInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy, and Toxicology· 1981Schneider-Helmert D, Schoenenberger GA. Acute and delayed effects of DSIP on human sleep behavior